ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2024
Acute Management of Deep Periorbital Burns: A 10-Year Review of Experience.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep periorbital burns are an important issue mainly due to the presence of the eyes in the region, and the crucial importance of preservation of vision. There is no consensus regarding their treatment. A retrospective analysis of the treatment and outcome of 446 patients with deep burns of the periorbital region admitted to the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of St George's University Hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria over 10 years was conducted. The study covers 446 patients, 162 female (36.5%) and 284 male (63.5%) aged from 5 months to 92 years. Deep periorbital burns accounted for 74.8% of hospitalized deep facial burns. Most frequent burn agents were hot liquids and flames. The mean total body surface area affected was 19.6% (min 0.5%, max 80.0%). Concomitant ocular pathology was diagnosed in 14% (n=63) of the patients. An early, staged and precise surgical approach was preferred, aimed at fast wound closure without sacrificing survived tissues. Follow up time ranged from 3 months to 5 years, median 37 months. Late ocular sequelae occurred in 7.4% (n=33) of the patients. There was no incidence of secondary corneal perforation or definitive loss of vision. Timely and adequate treatment during the acute period can minimize initial damage and late sequelae. Favor is given to the early, balanced surgical approach aimed at rapid wound closure between day 2 and 10 post burn. Preservation of vision is a determining factor for the significance of trauma and the effectiveness of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38680840PMC11041892What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.