Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38680815›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2024

Assessment of total aflatoxin and ochratoxin A in poultry feed ingredients by thin-layer chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Mustafa Rahim, Nadeem Rashid, Khanoranga, Waqas Ahmad, Zainia Rehmat, Afroz Rais, Zainab Siddique, Kashif Kamran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mustafa RahimCenter for Advanced Studies Vaccinology and Biotechnology, University of Balochistan Quetta, Quetta, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-5924
Nadeem RashidCenter for Advanced Studies Vaccinology and Biotechnology, University of Balochistan Quetta, Quetta, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3879-3969
KhanorangaDepartment of Environmental Science, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta, Quetta, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-0072
Waqas AhmadUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Narowal Campus, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4423-7371
Zainia RehmatDepartment of Microbiology, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6128-592X
Afroz RaisDepartment of Botany, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-3389
Zainab SiddiqueDepartment of Zoology, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3615-8876
Kashif KamranDepartment of Zoology, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1331-5434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of total aflatoxin (AF) and ochratoxin A (OTA) in poultry feed ingredients under different environmental conditions during the summer and winter seasons, while the hygiene quality of the feed ingredient was assessed through viable fungal count (VFC). Materials and Methods: A total of 288 poultry feed ingredients ( Results: The results of the current study confirmed the incidence of contamination with AF and OTA by TLC and ELISA methods. The contamination level of AF ranged from 26.09 to 50.56 (mean Conclusion: Mycotoxin contamination was significantly (

Indexed as

ochratoxin AThin layer chromatographytotal aflatoxinsviable fungal count

Identifiers

PMID38680815
PMCPMC11055573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.