ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2024
Latent TB treatment regimens in 2023: Wetmore TB clinic in New Orleans.
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The USPSTF has updated Latent TB Infection (LTBI) screening and treatment recommendations in 2023; describing treatment courses, side effects and benefits associated with each regimen. Overall, rifampin-containing shortened regimens are the preferred modality for LTBI treatment. A recent study in 2023 evaluated adherence and tolerance of the isoniazid(INH) + rifapentine(RPT), or "3HP" regimen and identified patient groups that may be at higher risk for non-completion of this regimen. It emphasized the need for targeted education at the beginning of treatment, to avoid early discontinuation. Our experience in New Orleans demonstrated that the 3HP is well-tolerated, with higher completion rates than other LTBI regimens. Utilizing a retrospective chart review model, we reviewed 756 patients who were treated for LTBI over a two-year period from 1/2021--12/2022. The three possible treatment regimens included isoniazid (INH) alone, rifampin (RIF) alone, or INH + RPT (3HP). Of these regimens, the highest completion rate was in the 3HP group, despite literature suggesting this regimen is difficult to tolerate. Our experience suggests that this may still be an efficacious regimen that is well-tolerated if there is good access to clinicians to discuss mitigating side effects. More data is needed to determine factors that led to the success or failure for each regimen. Our clinic does have increased availability of nursing and medical staff to discuss side effects and answer questions, which may have contributed to our relatively higher success rate. In addition, we applied the review recommendations to our patient population, and would recommend the consideration of diabetes, heavy alcohol use, and tobacco use as risk factors for patients that would benefit from LTBI screening and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.