[Hospitalisations Related To Burns In France. Analyses Of 2019's National Data Base].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Epidemiology and specificities of childhood burns. A 300 case series in a national referral centre].Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2025
   Article
2. [Epidemiology of burns in mayotte in 2022: an exhaustive study on a particular health area].Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2024
   Article
3. [Epidemiology of Burned Inpatient Children in French Guyana].Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as