Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38680535›Full record

ArticleCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2024

Enhancing Brain-Computer Interface Performance by Incorporating Brain-to-Brain Coupling.

Tianyu Jia, Jingyao Sun, Ciarán McGeady, Linhong Ji, Chong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Regional Variations in Mechanical Properties of Porcine Leptomeninges.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianyu JiaLab of Intelligent and Biomimetic Machinery, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-509X
Jingyao SunLab of Intelligent and Biomimetic Machinery, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-7766
Ciarán McGeadyDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-3649
Linhong JiLab of Intelligent and Biomimetic Machinery, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-4285
Chong LiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-7436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cooperation relies on key features of social interaction in order to reach desirable outcomes. Similarly, human-robot interaction may benefit from integration with human-human interaction factors. In this paper, we aim to investigate brain-to-brain coupling during motor imagery (MI)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) training using eye-contact and hand-touch interaction. Twelve pairs of friends (experimental group) and 10 pairs of strangers (control group) were recruited for MI-based BCI tests concurrent with electroencephalography (EEG) hyperscanning. Event-related desynchronization (ERD) was estimated to measure cortical activation, and interbrain functional connectivity was assessed using multilevel statistical analysis. Furthermore, we compared BCI classification performance under different social interaction conditions. In the experimental group, greater ERD was found around the contralateral sensorimotor cortex under social interaction conditions compared with MI without any social interaction. Notably, EEG channels with decreased power were mainly distributed around the frontal, central, and occipital regions. A significant increase in interbrain coupling was also found under social interaction conditions. BCI decoding accuracies were significantly improved in the eye contact condition and eye and hand contact condition compared with the no-interaction condition. However, for the strangers' group, no positive effects were observed in comparisons of cortical activations between interaction and no-interaction conditions. These findings indicate that social interaction can improve the neural synchronization between familiar partners with enhanced brain activations and brain-to-brain coupling. This study may provide a novel method for enhancing MI-based BCI performance in conjunction with neural synchronization between users.

Identifiers

PMID38680535
PMCPMC11052607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.