Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38680531›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

The supplementation of female dogs with live yeast

Quentin Garrigues, Amélie Mugnier, Sylvie Chastant, Flavie Sicard, Jean-Charles Martin, Ljubica Svilar, Mathieu Castex, Manuel Guillermo Ramis-Vidal, Nicoletta Rovere, Laurine Michaud and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Developmental programming in dogs.Biology of reproduction · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Maternal oral supplementation withFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Effect of yeast probioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Impact ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Quentin GarriguesNeoCare, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Amélie MugnierLallemand SAS, Blagnac, France.
Sylvie ChastantNeoCare, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Flavie SicardAix-Marseille Université, C2VN, INRAE, INSERM, Marseille, France.
Jean-Charles MartinAix-Marseille Université, C2VN, INRAE, INSERM, Marseille, France.
Ljubica SvilarAix-Marseille Université, C2VN, INRAE, INSERM, Marseille, France.
Mathieu CastexLallemand SAS, Blagnac, France.
Manuel Guillermo Ramis-VidalDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Nicoletta RovereDepartment of HASFS, VESPA, University of Veterinary, Milan, Italy.
Laurine MichaudNeoCare, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Pauline DavidNeoCare, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Elodie MansalierNeoCare, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Ana RodilesLallemand SAS, Blagnac, France.
Hanna MilaNeoCare, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Emmanuelle ApperLallemand SAS, Blagnac, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time around parturition is a stressful period for both bitches and their puppies. The use of probiotics has been proposed, e.g., in pigs, to improve health status of sows, their reproductive performances and in turn, the health and performance of their progeny. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact, on both dams and puppies, of a supplementation of bitches with the live yeast

Indexed as

dogimmunometabolic phenotypematernal programmingpuppySaccharomyces cerevisiae boulardiiyeast

Identifiers

PMID38680531
PMCPMC11048480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.