Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38680445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Co-learning synaptic delays, weights and adaptation in spiking neural networks.

Lucas Deckers, Laurens Van Damme, Werner Van Leekwijck, Ing Jyh Tsang, Steven Latré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucas DeckersIDLab, imec, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Laurens Van DammeIDLab, imec, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Werner Van LeekwijckIDLab, imec, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ing Jyh TsangIDLab, imec, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Steven LatréIDLab, imec, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking neural network (SNN) distinguish themselves from artificial neural network (ANN) because of their inherent temporal processing and spike-based computations, enabling a power-efficient implementation in neuromorphic hardware. In this study, we demonstrate that data processing with spiking neurons can be enhanced by co-learning the synaptic weights with two other biologically inspired neuronal features: (1) a set of parameters describing neuronal adaptation processes and (2) synaptic propagation delays. The former allows a spiking neuron to learn how to specifically react to incoming spikes based on its past. The trained adaptation parameters result in neuronal heterogeneity, which leads to a greater variety in available spike patterns and is also found in the brain. The latter enables to learn to explicitly correlate spike trains that are temporally distanced. Synaptic delays reflect the time an action potential requires to travel from one neuron to another. We show that each of the co-learned features separately leads to an improvement over the baseline SNN and that the combination of both leads to state-of-the-art SNN results on all speech recognition datasets investigated with a simple 2-hidden layer feed-forward network. Our SNN outperforms the benchmark ANN on the neuromorphic datasets (Spiking Heidelberg Digits and Spiking Speech Commands), even with fewer trainable parameters. On the 35-class Google Speech Commands dataset, our SNN also outperforms a GRU of similar size. Our study presents brain-inspired improvements in SNN that enable them to excel over an equivalent ANN of similar size on tasks with rich temporal dynamics.

Indexed as

co-learningneuronal adaptationspeech recognitionspiking neural networkssurrogate gradientssynaptic delays

Identifiers

PMID38680445
PMCPMC11055628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.