ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Co-learning synaptic delays, weights and adaptation in spiking neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three factor delay learning rules for spiking neural networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Efficient event-based delay learning in spiking neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Advancing spatio-temporal processing through adaptation in spiking neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Exploring neural oscillations during speech perception via surrogate gradient spiking neural networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiking neural network (SNN) distinguish themselves from artificial neural network (ANN) because of their inherent temporal processing and spike-based computations, enabling a power-efficient implementation in neuromorphic hardware. In this study, we demonstrate that data processing with spiking neurons can be enhanced by co-learning the synaptic weights with two other biologically inspired neuronal features: (1) a set of parameters describing neuronal adaptation processes and (2) synaptic propagation delays. The former allows a spiking neuron to learn how to specifically react to incoming spikes based on its past. The trained adaptation parameters result in neuronal heterogeneity, which leads to a greater variety in available spike patterns and is also found in the brain. The latter enables to learn to explicitly correlate spike trains that are temporally distanced. Synaptic delays reflect the time an action potential requires to travel from one neuron to another. We show that each of the co-learned features separately leads to an improvement over the baseline SNN and that the combination of both leads to state-of-the-art SNN results on all speech recognition datasets investigated with a simple 2-hidden layer feed-forward network. Our SNN outperforms the benchmark ANN on the neuromorphic datasets (Spiking Heidelberg Digits and Spiking Speech Commands), even with fewer trainable parameters. On the 35-class Google Speech Commands dataset, our SNN also outperforms a GRU of similar size. Our study presents brain-inspired improvements in SNN that enable them to excel over an equivalent ANN of similar size on tasks with rich temporal dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.