ReviewConsortium psychiatricum2020
Community-based mental health services in Brazil.
Review in Consortium psychiatricum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Voices from the territory and living care networks: facilitators and barriers to implementing peer support in community mental health services in Brazil.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Coping with the invisible impacts of COVID-19 in a context of polycrises: wellbeing strategies of marginalised urban and Indigenous Brazilian youth.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Depression Treatment Within a TB Program and Primary Care in Brazil.Health promotion practice · 2024Article
- Mental disorders in adults from Ribeirão Preto, Brazil: a cross-sectional analysis of two birth cohorts.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Impact of Legal Traditions on Forensic Mental Health Treatment Worldwide.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
- Interpersonal violence and depression in Brazil: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 National Health Survey.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Challenges and Insights From Treating Psychotic Disorders During COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The shift from the hospital-based model of care to community-based mental health services began three decades ago and is still an ongoing process in Brazil. Objectives: To update data on the development of the community mental health services network in Brazil in relation to service availability and structure, manpower, pattern of service use, financing, epidemiological studies and the burden of mental disorders, research and national mental health policy. Methods: Searches were constructed to collect data on indexed databases (Medline, Scielo), as well as governmental,NGOs and medical council sources, reports and the grey literature up until 30th March, 2019. Results: Community mental health services are unevenly distributed in the country. Brazil leads the world in terms of the prevalence of anxiety disorders, ranking fifth for depression prevalence. Violence and suicide rates are two growing factors which exacerbate the prevalence of mental disorders prevalence. An increased reduction of the number of psychiatric beds in the country, in addition to the unbalanced growth of services in the community, has resulted in treatment gaps and the underutilization of services and barriers to treating people with the most severe psychosis. Investment in mental healthcare is still scarce. However, mental health funding is not addressed according to the population´s needs and scientific evidence, resulting in a waste of resources and inefficiency. Programmes and service interruptions are common according to each government mandate. Conclusion: Successive changes in ideological perspectives have led to the introduction of policies which have caused fragmentation in the mental health system and services. A lack of evaluation and transparency of services and costs are the main barriers to integrating multiple services and planning long-term developmental phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.