ArticleACS omega2024
Gap-Δenergy, a New Metric of the Bond Energy State, Assisting to Predict Molecular Toxicity.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plasma Metabolome and Metabolite Toxicity Profiling of Moderate-Intensity Running in Human Females.Metabolites · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular toxicity is a critical feature of drug development. It is thus very important to develop computational models to evaluate the toxicity of small molecules. The accuracy of toxicity prediction largely depends on the quality of molecular representation; however, current methods for this purpose do not address this issue well. Here, we introduce a new metric, gap-Δenergy, which is designed to quantify the intermolecular bond energy difference with atom distance. We next find significant variations in the gap-Δenergy distribution among different types of molecules. Moreover, we show that this metric is able to distinguish the toxic small molecules. We collected data sets of toxic and exogenous small molecules and presented a novel index, namely, global toxicity, to evaluate the overall toxicity of molecules. Based on molecular descriptors and the proposed gap-Δenergy metric, we further constructed machine learning models that were trained with 7816 small molecules. The XGBoost-based model achieved the best performance with an AUC score of 0.965 and an F1 score of 0.849 on the test set (1954 small molecules), which outperformed the model that did not use gap-Δenergy features, with a sensitivity score increase of 3.2%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.