ArticleACS omega2024
Molecular Design of Novel Herbicide and Insecticide Seed Compounds with Machine Learning.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning- and AI-Driven QSAR Models for the Discovery of Novel Potential Fungicides: FAPI (Fungicide Targeting Acid Phosphatase Inhibition).Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
- Development of Pesticide-Likeness Scores and Models for Predicting Pesticide Activity of Molecular Scaffolds with Machine Learning.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides are widely used to improve crop productivity by eliminating weeds and pests. Conventional pesticide development involves synthesizing compounds, testing their activities, and studying their effects on the ecosystem. However, as pesticide discovery has an extremely low success rate, many compounds must be synthesized and tested. To overcome the high human, financial, and time costs of this process, machine learning is attracting increasing attention. In this study, we used machine learning for the molecular design of novel seed compounds for herbicides and insecticides. Classification models were constructed by using compounds that had been tested as herbicides and insecticides, and an inverse analysis of the constructed models was conducted. In the molecular design of herbicides, we proposed 186 new samples as herbicides using ensemble learning and a method for expressing explanatory variables that consider the relationships among eight weed species. For the molecular design of insecticides, we used undersampling and ensemble learning for the analysis of unbalanced data. Based on approximately 340,000 compounds, 12 potential insecticides were proposed, of which 2 exhibited actual activity when tested. These results demonstrate the potential of the developed machine-learning method for rapidly identifying novel herbicides and insecticides.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.