ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Cancer drug sensitivity estimation using modular deep Graph Neural Networks.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: linking biological discovery to clinical utility.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Multimodal interpretable deep learning for transcriptome-informed precision oncology and drug mechanism analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI-Guided Discovery of Oncogenic Signaling Crosstalk in Tumor Progression and Drug Resistance.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Temporal network analysis in systems biology: concepts, inference, and validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- AI-powered precision medicine: utilizing genetic risk factor optimization to revolutionize healthcare.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Using mathematical modelling and AI to improve delivery and efficacy of therapies in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational drug sensitivity models have the potential to improve therapeutic outcomes by identifying targeted drugs components that are tailored to the transcriptomic profile of a given primary tumor. The SMILES representation of molecules that is used by state-of-the-art drug-sensitivity models is not conducive for neural networks to generalize to new drugs, in part because the distance between atoms does not generally correspond to the distance between their representation in the SMILES strings. Graph-attention networks, on the other hand, are high-capacity models that require large training-data volumes which are not available for drug-sensitivity estimation. We develop a modular drug-sensitivity graph-attentional neural network. The modular architecture allows us to separately pre-train the graph encoder and graph-attentional pooling layer on related tasks for which more data are available. We observe that this model outperforms reference models for the use cases of precision oncology and drug discovery; in particular, it is better able to predict the specific interaction between drug and cell line that is not explained by the general cytotoxicity of the drug and the overall survivability of the cell line. The complete source code is available at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8020945. All experiments are based on the publicly available GDSC data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.