Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38680251›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

Cancer drug sensitivity estimation using modular deep Graph Neural Networks.

Pedro A Campana, Paul Prasse, Matthias Lienhard, Kristina Thedinga, Ralf Herwig, Tobias Scheffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pedro A CampanaUniversity of Potsdam, Department of Computer Science, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4909-6688
Paul PrasseUniversity of Potsdam, Department of Computer Science, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1842-3645
Matthias LienhardMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Department Computational Molecular Biology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-3142
Kristina ThedingaMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Department Computational Molecular Biology, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf HerwigMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Department Computational Molecular Biology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-1760
Tobias SchefferUniversity of Potsdam, Department of Computer Science, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4405-7925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational drug sensitivity models have the potential to improve therapeutic outcomes by identifying targeted drugs components that are tailored to the transcriptomic profile of a given primary tumor. The SMILES representation of molecules that is used by state-of-the-art drug-sensitivity models is not conducive for neural networks to generalize to new drugs, in part because the distance between atoms does not generally correspond to the distance between their representation in the SMILES strings. Graph-attention networks, on the other hand, are high-capacity models that require large training-data volumes which are not available for drug-sensitivity estimation. We develop a modular drug-sensitivity graph-attentional neural network. The modular architecture allows us to separately pre-train the graph encoder and graph-attentional pooling layer on related tasks for which more data are available. We observe that this model outperforms reference models for the use cases of precision oncology and drug discovery; in particular, it is better able to predict the specific interaction between drug and cell line that is not explained by the general cytotoxicity of the drug and the overall survivability of the cell line. The complete source code is available at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8020945. All experiments are based on the publicly available GDSC data.

Identifiers

PMID38680251
PMCPMC11055499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.