ArticleVeterinary world2024
Supplementation of
Article in Veterinary world, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogenic mechanisms of Aeromonas hydrophila and the protective role of probiotics in sustainable aquaculture.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Synergistic dietary supplements of Lactobacillus brevis and trans-cinnamic acid improved growth, immune response, and disease resistance in common carp.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Probiotic Properties In Vitro ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- The Significance of Probiotics in Aquaculture: A Review of Research Trend and Latest Scientific Findings.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effects of Microorganisms in Fish Aquaculture from a Sustainable Approach: A Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Modulation of Gut Microbiota, Intestinal Physiology, and Digestive Enzyme Levels by Duo-Strain Probiotics in African Catfish (Aquaculture nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Co-Encapsulated ProbioticInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Catfish has a high economic value and is popular among consumers. To ensure well-stocked catfish stocks, good fisheries management must also be ensured. The high demand for catfish must be supplemented by preventive measures against pathogenic bacterial infections using probiotics with high potential for Materials and Methods: This study used a completely randomized study with eight treatments and three replications. The manipulated factor was the probiotic concentration [0% (A), 0.5% (B), 10% (C), and 15% (D)] in groups of catfish infected and uninfected with Results: Providing probiotics in feed can increase the nutritional value of feed based on proximate test results. There were significant differences in average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and survival rate (SR) parameters in the group of catfish infected with Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that using a combination of probiotics
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.