Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38679984›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024

Chronological Trend of Opportunistic Endoscopic Screening for Gastric Cancer and Atrophic Gastritis.

Keiko Nakamura, Yasuo Kakukgawa, Masau Sekiguchi, Eriko So Tsuruki, Minori Matsumoto, Izumi Hisada, Yasuhiko Mizuguchi, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Taku Sakamoto, Yutaka Saito and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Post-endoscopy gastric cancer in Latin America: a multicentre cohort study from Colombia.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Screening for and surveillance of premalignant conditions of the stomach.Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Keiko NakamuraCancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3429-6957
Yasuo KakukgawaCancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masau SekiguchiCancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Eriko So TsurukiCancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Minori MatsumotoCancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Izumi HisadaCancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiko MizuguchiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki TakamaruEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taku SakamotoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nozomu KobayashiCancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahisa MatsudaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpportunistic endoscopic screening for gastric cancer was initiated in 2004 at our institute. We investigated chronological trends in gastric cancer detection rates based on individual characteristics and atrophic gastritis prevalence.

methodsOverall, 15,081 asymptomatic individuals aged ≥40 years without a medical history of gastric cancer underwent first-time esophagogastroduodenoscopy in our institute between February 2004 and December 2017. We retrospectively investigated individual characteristics and endoscopic diagnoses by period (early period: 2004-2007, middle period: 2008-2012, and late period: 2013-2017), clarified the long-term detection rate and the characteristics of endoscopic screening-detected gastric cancer, and evaluated the relationship between gastric cancer and atrophic gastritis.

resultsGastric cancer detection rates in the early, middle, and late periods were 1.01% (76/7,503, men/women: 4,360/3,143, average age: 59.4 years, prevalence of atrophic gastritis: 72%), 0.69% (40/5,820, men/women: 3,668/2,152, average age: 56.8 years, prevalence of atrophic gastritis: 48%), and 0.46% (8/1,758, men/women: 1,083/675, average age: 58.7 years, prevalence of atrophic gastritis: 37%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.28-2.95), age ≥75 years (2.73, 95% CI 1.32-5.05), and atrophic gastritis (C1-C3: 2.21, 1.36-3.73, O1-O3: 5.36, 3.17-9.30) were significantly associated with the incidence of gastric cancer.

conclusionsThe gastric cancer detection rate and atrophic gastritis prevalence have decreased over time. However, continuing endoscopic screening is important, especially for those at a high risk of developing gastric cancer complicated by severe atrophic gastritis.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerGastritis, AtrophicStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisRetrospective Studiesatrophic gastritisEndoscopyGastric cancerScreeningupper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38679984
PMCPMC11162711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.