Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38679940›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2024

The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation.

Rachel K Schuck, Sunghee Choi, Kaitlynn Mp Baiden, Patrick Dwyer, Mirko Uljarević

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel K SchuckDepartment of Education, University of California, ,Santa Barbara, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-1223
Sunghee ChoiDepartment of Education, University of California, ,Santa Barbara, USA.
Kaitlynn Mp BaidenDepartment of Education, University of California, ,Santa Barbara, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-9197
Patrick DwyerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1779-5252
Mirko UljarevićDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7481-3923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractNeurodiversity refers to the idea that brain differences (including disabilities) are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward neurodiversity can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people (those whose brains do not fit society's "standard"). These impacts can include effects on daily interactions, as well as how professionals such as teachers and doctors deliver services to neurodivergent people. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ). NDAQ development included revision of questionnaire items based on feedback from experts and neurodivergent people, systematically evaluating the way participants responded to questionnaire items, and analysis of how the NDAQ items are grouped into different factors. A preliminary analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working or planning to work in a helping profession (e.g. doctors, teachers, therapists, and so on) indicates that the NDAQ measures attitudes toward neurodiversity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the broad idea of neurodiversity, further work is still needed.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultattitudeshelping professionalsinstrument developmentneurodiversity

Identifiers

PMID38679940
PMCPMC11497738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.