Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38679750›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2024

From Bench-to-Bedside: How Artificial Intelligence is Changing Thyroid Nodule Diagnostics, a Systematic Review.

Vivek R Sant, Ashwath Radhachandran, Vedrana Ivezic, Denise T Lee, Masha J Livhits, James X Wu, Rinat Masamed, Corey W Arnold, Michael W Yeh, William Speier

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vivek R SantDivision of Endocrine Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7688-7790
Ashwath RadhachandranBiomedical Artificial Intelligence Research Lab, UCLA Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-0312
Vedrana IvezicBiomedical Artificial Intelligence Research Lab, UCLA Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-8929
Denise T LeeDepartment of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-9203-925X
Masha J LivhitsSection of Endocrine Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8436-392X
James X WuSection of Endocrine Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5090-7573
Rinat MasamedDepartment of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9672-4131
Corey W ArnoldBiomedical Artificial Intelligence Research Lab, UCLA Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4119-8143
Michael W YehSection of Endocrine Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-4245
William SpeierBiomedical Artificial Intelligence Research Lab, UCLA Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0890-8684

Funding

Predicting the Presence of Clinically Significant Thyroid Cancer using Ultrasound ImagingR21EB030691 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SPEIER, WILLIAM F · 2021 to 2023
$586k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030691NIH HHS R21EB030691UCLA Radiology Exploratory Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextUse of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict clinical outcomes in thyroid nodule diagnostics has grown exponentially over the past decade. The greatest challenge is in understanding the best model to apply to one's own patient population, and how to operationalize such a model in practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search of PubMed and IEEE Xplore was conducted for English-language publications between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2023, studying diagnostic tests on suspected thyroid nodules that used AI. We excluded articles without prospective or external validation, nonprimary literature, duplicates, focused on nonnodular thyroid conditions, not using AI, and those incidentally using AI in support of an experimental diagnostic outside standard clinical practice. Quality was graded by Oxford level of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 61 studies were identified; all performed external validation, 16 studies were prospective, and 33 compared a model to physician prediction of ground truth. Statistical validation was reported in 50 papers. A diagnostic pipeline was abstracted, yielding 5 high-level outcomes: (1) nodule localization, (2) ultrasound (US) risk score, (3) molecular status, (4) malignancy, and (5) long-term prognosis. Seven prospective studies validated a single commercial AI; strengths included automating nodule feature assessment from US and assisting the physician in predicting malignancy risk, while weaknesses included automated margin prediction and interobserver variability.

conclusionModels predominantly used US images to predict malignancy. Of 4 Food and Drug Administration-approved products, only S-Detect was extensively validated. Implementing an AI model locally requires data sanitization and revalidation to ensure appropriate clinical performance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceThyroid NoduleHumansThyroid Neoplasmsartificial intelligencediagnosticsmachine learningthyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID38679750
PMCPMC11180510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.