ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Central retinal artery occlusion after intravitreal brolucizumab injection for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration; a case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-dimensional multi-modal foundation model for optical coherence tomography.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Central Retinal Artery Occlusion After Intravitreal Injection of Faricimab: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Research progress on the correlation between corneal neovascularization and lymphangiogenesis (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo report a case of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab for a treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patient without comorbid cardiovascular disease history. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old Asian male without a cardiovascular disease history such as diabetes or hypertension underwent three times of monthly consecutive intravitreal brolucizumab injections for treatment of progressed nAMD in his left eye. Two days after the third injection, the patient presented with acute painless visual loss. Typical retinal whitening with a cherry red spot was observed on the fundus photograph, and retinal swelling with hyper-reflectivity was also identified on the optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan. On the fundus fluorescein angiography, arm-to-retina time and arteriovenous transit time were remarkedly delayed, but clinical findings suggesting an intraocular inflammation (IOI) were not observed. Therefore, CRAO was diagnosed, and anterior chamber paracentesis was administrated immediately. However, there had been no improvement in visual acuity during the follow-up period of three months, despite prolonged oral steroid and anti-platelet agent medication.
conclusionsIn rare cases, patients without cardiovascular comorbidities can develop CRAO after intravitreal brolucizumab injection without gross evidence of IOI. Therefore, CRAO should always be in consideration and careful observation is required after intravitreal brolucizumab injection for nAMD patients with old age, even if the patient does not have any other cardiovascular disease history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.