Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38679717›Full record

ArticleBMC zoology2024

Daubenton's bats maintain stereotypical echolocation behaviour and a lombard response during target interception in light.

Astrid Saermark Uebel, Michael Bjerre Pedersen, Kristian Beedholm, Laura Stidsholt, Marie Rosenkjaer Skalshøi, Ilias Foskolos, Peter Teglberg Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC zoology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Astrid Saermark UebelSection for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. astrid.s.uebel@bio.au.dk.
Michael Bjerre PedersenSection for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristian BeedholmSection for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Laura StidsholtSection for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marie Rosenkjaer SkalshøiSection for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ilias FoskolosSection for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter Teglberg MadsenSection for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

Natur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd FNU 0135-00343AVillum Fonden 41386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most bats hunt insects on the wing at night using echolocation as their primary sensory modality, but nevertheless maintain complex eye anatomy and functional vision. This raises the question of how and when insectivorous bats use vision during their largely nocturnal lifestyle. Here, we test the hypothesis that the small insectivorous bat, Myotis daubentonii, relies less on echolocation, or dispenses with it entirely, as visual cues become available during challenging acoustic noise conditions. We trained five wild-caught bats to land on a spherical target in both silence and when exposed to broad-band noise to decrease echo detectability, while light conditions were manipulated in both spectrum and intensity. We show that during noise exposure, the bats were almost three times more likely to use multiple attempts to solve the task compared to in silent controls. Furthermore, the bats exhibited a Lombard response of 0.18 dB/dB

Indexed as

Active sensingBiosonarLombard responseMultimodalityNoise effectSubcortical reflexVision

Identifiers

PMID38679717
PMCPMC11057132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.