Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38679713›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024

Is a randomised controlled trial of take home naloxone distributed in emergency settings likely to be feasible and acceptable? Findings from a UK qualitative study exploring perspectives of people who use opioids and emergency services staff.

F C Sampson, J Hughes, J Long, P Buykx, S W Goodacre, H Snooks, A Edwards, Bridie Evans, Jenna Jones, Chris Moore and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F C SampsonDivision of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. f.c.sampson@sheffield.ac.uk.
J HughesDivision of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
J LongDivision of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
P BuykxSchool of Humanities, Creative Industries and Social Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
S W GoodacreDivision of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
H SnooksDepartment of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
A EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Bridie EvansDepartment of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Jenna JonesDepartment of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Chris MooreWelsh Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.
Sasha JohnstonSouth West Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR HTA 16/91/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDistribution of take-home naloxone (THN) by emergency services may increase access to THN and reduce deaths and morbidity from opioid overdose. As part of a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of distribution of THN kits and education within ambulance services and Emergency Departments (EDs), we used qualitative methods to explore key stakeholders' perceptions of feasibility and acceptability of delivering the trial.

methodsWe undertook semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 26 people who use opioids and with 20 paramedics and ED staff from two intervention sites between 2019 and 2021. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework Analysis.

resultsPeople using opioids reported high awareness of overdose management, including personal experience of THN use. Staff perceived emergency service provision of THN as a low-cost, low-risk intervention with potential to reduce mortality, morbidity and health service use. Staff understood the trial aims and considered it compatible with their work. All participants supported widening access to THN but reported limited trial recruitment opportunities partly due to difficulties in consenting patients during overdose. Procedural problems, restrictive recruitment protocols, limited staff buy-in and patients already owning THN limited trial recruitment. Determining trial effectiveness was challenging due to high levels of alternative community provision of THN.

conclusionsDistribution of THN in emergency settings was considered feasible and acceptable for stakeholders but an RCT to establish the effectiveness of THN delivery is unlikely to generate further useful evidence due to difficulties in recruiting patients and assessing benefits.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsQualitative ResearchAdultDrug OverdoseEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsDrug overdose preventionEmergency servicesFeasibility studyPatient perspectivesQualitative researchTake home naloxone

Identifiers

PMID38679713
PMCPMC11057101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.