Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38679712›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Stress & strain in mechanically nonuniform alveoli using clinical input variables: a simple conceptual model.

John J Marini, Patricia R M Rocco, Lauren T Thornton, Philip S Crooke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hidden Cavities and the Illusion of Margin Sufficiency in Deep Wedge Resection.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Mechanical Power and its Components vs Driving Pressure for Predicting Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Mechanical power and VILI: modeling limits and unknowns.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John J MariniDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, St Paul, MN, USA. marin002@umn.edu.
Patricia R M RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lauren T ThorntonDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, St Paul, MN, USA.
Philip S CrookeDepartment of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians currently monitor pressure and volume at the airway opening, assuming that these observations relate closely to stresses and strains at the micro level. Indeed, this assumption forms the basis of current approaches to lung protective ventilation. Nonetheless, although the airway pressure applied under static conditions may be the same everywhere in healthy lungs, the stresses within a mechanically non-uniform ARDS lung are not. Estimating actual tissue stresses and strains that occur in a mechanically non-uniform environment must account for factors beyond the measurements from the ventilator circuit of airway pressures, tidal volume, and total mechanical power. A first conceptual step for the clinician to better define the VILI hazard requires consideration of lung unit tension, stress focusing, and intracycle power concentration. With reasonable approximations, better understanding of the value and limitations of presently used general guidelines for lung protection may eventually be developed from clinical inputs measured by the caregiver. The primary purpose of the present thought exercise is to extend our published model of a uniform, spherical lung unit to characterize the amplifications of stress (tension) and strain (area change) that occur under static conditions at interface boundaries between a sphere's surface segments having differing compliances. Together with measurable ventilating power, these are incorporated into our perspective of VILI risk. This conceptual exercise brings to light how variables that are seldom considered by the clinician but are both recognizable and measurable might help gauge the hazard for VILI of applied pressure and power.

Indexed as

Pulmonary AlveoliHumansModels, BiologicalRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeStress, MechanicalARDSMechanical lung strainMechanical lung stressMechanical powerNon-homogeneityStress amplificationVentilator induced lung injuryVILI

Identifiers

PMID38679712
PMCPMC11057067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.