ArticleHeart and vessels2024
Characteristics of successful termination of atrial fibrillation by atrial antitachycardia pacing in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in cardiac sarcoidosis.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of atrial antitachycardia pacing to prevent progression to permanent atrial fibrillation in patients implanted with pacemakers.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Do not stop effective atrial-based antitachycardia pacing: Insights into episode duration and success rate for termination.HeartRhythm case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is often found in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Second-generation atrial antitachycardia pacing (A-ATP) is effective in managing AF in patients implanted with CIEDs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-ATP in patients implanted with CIEDs. This was a single-center retrospective study involving 91 patients (male 46 patients, mean age 74 ± 9 years) implanted with Reactive A-ATP equipped devices (84 patients with pacemakers, 6 with ICDs, and 1 with a CRT-D). The AF burden, rate of AF termination, and details of the activation of the A-ATP were analyzed in each patient. During a mean follow-up period of 21 ± 13 months, A-ATP was activated in 45 of 91 patients (49.5%). No patients had adverse events. Although the efficacy of the A-ATP varied among the patients, the median rate of AF termination was 44%. In comparison to the A-ATP start time, "0 min" had a higher AF termination rate by the A-ATP (39.4% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.011). The rate of termination by the A-ATP was high for AF with a long cycle length and a relatively regular rhythm. A-ATP successfully terminated AF episodes in some patients implanted with CIEDs. The optimal settings of the A-ATP will be determined in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38679637What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.