ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024
Determining the relationship of p16
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell infusion for frailty: a phase 2, single-centre, randomised, open-label controlled trial.EBioMedicine · 2026Trial
- Biomarkers of Cellular Senescence and their Association with Frailty, Clinical Outcomes, and Survival in Multiple Myeloma.Research square · 2026Article
- AI-driven chemotoxicity prediction in colorectal cancer: impact of race, SDOH, and biological aging.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Aging-related Metabolic and Biological Markers between Cancer Survivors and Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.Journal of cancer prevention · 2025Review
- Biological Aging and Chemotoxicity in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Secondary Data Analysis Using EHR Data.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Accelerated Aging in Cancer and Cancer Treatment: Current Status of Biomarkers.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Association of p16(INK4a), a biomarker of cellular senescence, with receipt of therapy and frailty status among adults with plasma cell disorders.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2025Article
- Turning stress into success: A festschrift in honor of Janice Kiecolt-Glaser.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOlder adults with hematologic malignancies (HM) have unique challenges due to age and fitness. The primary aim of this pilot study was to benchmark the ability of multiple biomarkers of aging (p16, epigenetic clocks, T cell gene expression profiles, and T cell receptor excision circles (TREC) to identify frailty as measured by a clinical impairment index (I
methods70 patients newly diagnosed with HM had peripheral blood T lymphocytes (PBTL) analyzed for p16
resultsAge-adjusted p16
conclusionsOur pilot data suggest that multiple blood-based aging biomarkers have potential to identify frailty in older adults with HM. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: We developed the I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.