Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678484›Full record

ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2024

Process Evaluation and Investigation of Cultural Adaptations for an Online Parent-Based Intervention Using a Mixed-Method Approach.

Reed M Morgan, Constanza Trejo, Bradley M Trager, Sarah C Boyle, Ina M Koning, Joseph W LaBrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reed M MorganDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0302-1766
Constanza TrejoPsychology Department of Health and Student Welfare, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Bradley M TragerDepartment of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA. bradley.trager@lmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8832-4442
Sarah C BoyleDepartment of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5888-3967
Ina M KoningDepartment of Clinical Child and Family Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0305-0487
Joseph W LaBrieDepartment of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3485-3787

Funding

Revolutionizing Normative Re-education: Delivering Enhanced PNF within a Social Media Inspired Game About College LifeR01AA027168 · NIAAA · LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY · PI LABRIE, JOSEPH W., NEIGHBORS, CLAYTON · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Extension and Online Adaptation of the FITSTART parent-based intervention to reduce drinking among first-year studentsR34AA026422 · NIAAA · LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY · PI LABRIE, JOSEPH W. · 2018 to 2020
$621k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027168NIAAA NIH HHS R34 AA026422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most alcohol intervention research focuses on program efficacy, yet few studies have investigated the acceptability of a program's design and implementation to the target population or adapting existing alcohol interventions to different populations. To address these gaps in the literature, we (1) examined participant responsiveness to and implementation quality of FITSTART+, a web-app delivered parent-based alcohol intervention designed for incoming first-year college students in the United States, and (2) gathered feedback on how this intervention could be adapted to other populations of parents. A sample of U.S. parents of 17-20-year-old first-year college students (N = 109) participated in FITSTART+ during their child's first year of college and completed a survey about parents' responsiveness to the app and its quality. Next, a sample of non-U.S. parents of adolescents aged 13 to 19 (N = 44) participated in one of 11 focus groups in which they briefly explored the app and then discussed how it could be adapted to be applicable and culturally relevant for them and their context. Results revealed that U.S. parents rated the intervention's quality as high and parents were responsive to the web-app's content, but some did not visit one of the most critical aspects of the intervention (i.e., alcohol-related parenting resources). Non-U.S. participants provided a range of suggestions for adapting the intervention to their context, which varied by culture. Results identify areas for improvement, particularly regarding the use of alcohol-related parenting resources, in this intervention and for web-delivered PBIs more broadly.

Indexed as

ParentsAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInternet-Based InterventionMaleMobile ApplicationsProgram EvaluationStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUniversitiesYoung AdultAdolescenceAlcoholCross-culturalmHealthParent-based interventionProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38678484
PMCPMC11271356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.