Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678416›Full record

ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2024

Pollutant removal in an experimental bioretention cell situated in a northern Chinese sponge city.

Chunyan Shi, Xia Feng, Weining Sun, Hong Qiu, Gen Liu, Siwen Li, Jing Xie, Pengxuan Wang, Yingzi Lin, Xindong Wei and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Willingness-to-pay for sponge city green infrastructure benefits in China based on discrete choice experiment.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chunyan ShiFaculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan; School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-539X
Xia FengSchool of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China.
Weining SunEnvironmental Building Branch, Changchun Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co. Ltd, Changchun 130031, China.
Hong QiuChina Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd, Chengdu 610031, China.
Gen LiuSchool of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China.
Siwen LiSchool of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China.
Jing XieFaculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan.
Pengxuan WangSchool of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China.
Yingzi LinSchool of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China.
Xindong WeiSchool of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China.
Tongyu XuFaculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan E-mail: e3dbb008@eng.kitakyu-u.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3579-5222
Weijun GaoFaculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the viability and effectiveness of bioretention cell in enhancing rainwater resource utilization within sponge cities, this study employs field monitoring, laboratory testing, and statistical analysis to evaluate the water purification capabilities of bioretention cell. Findings indicate a marked purification impact on surface runoff, with removal efficiencies of 59.81% for suspended solids (SS), 39.01% for chemical oxygen demand (COD), 37.53% for ammonia nitrogen (NH

Indexed as

CitiesBiological Oxygen Demand AnalysisChinaPhosphorusWaste Disposal, FluidWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationPhosphorusWater Pollutants, Chemicalbioretention cellspurification effectrainwater reusesponge citysurface runoff

Identifiers

PMID38678416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.