Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678214›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Emotion regulation unveiled through the categorical lens of attachment.

Marcos Domic-Siede, Mónica Guzmán-González, Andrea Sánchez-Corzo, Xaviera Álvarez, Vanessa Araya, Camila Espinoza, Karla Zenis, Jennifer Marín-Medina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Touch as emotion regulation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcos Domic-SiedeLaboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile. mdomic@ucn.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-1133
Mónica Guzmán-GonzálezLaboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-0451
Andrea Sánchez-CorzoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4042-7036
Xaviera ÁlvarezLaboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8916-5213
Vanessa ArayaLaboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile.
Camila EspinozaLaboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2587-3652
Karla ZenisLaboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1145-5881
Jennifer Marín-MedinaLaboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5181-4990

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 11220009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotion regulation, the process by which individuals manage and modify their emotional experiences, expressions, and responses to adaptively navigate and cope with various situations, plays a crucial role in daily life. Our study investigates the variations in emotion regulation strategies among individuals with different attachment styles (AS). Specifically, we examine how individuals with secure, anxious, avoidant, and fearful attachment styles effectively utilize cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression to regulate their emotions.

methodsA total of n = 98 adults were instructed to attend, reappraise, or suppress their emotions while viewing negative and neutral images from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in an experimental emotion regulation task. After completing the task, participants rated the valence and arousal elicited by the images. Attachment styles were measured using the ECR-12 questionnaire and then categorized into four AS.

resultsOur study revealed that individuals with secure AS (n = 39) effectively reduced displeasure through cognitive reappraisal but experienced levels of displeasure with expressive suppression. Anxious AS (n = 16) individuals successfully reduced displeasure using cognitive reappraisal but struggled to regulate arousal and effectively use expressive suppression. Avoidant AS (n = 24) individuals could reduce displeasure with both strategies but experienced high arousal during suppression attempts. Fearful AS (n = 19) individuals effectively regulated both displeasure and arousal using either strategy. However, Secure AS individuals showed superior reappraisal efficacy, significantly reducing arousal levels compared to the Fearful AS group. Both Secure and Avoidant AS groups experienced higher valence during reappraisal relative to a baseline, indicating a decrease in displeasure.

conclusionsIndividuals with different AS exhibit variations in the effectiveness of their use of emotion regulation strategies. Our findings reinforce the significance of AS in shaping emotion regulation processes and emphasize the need for tailored approaches to support individuals with different attachment orientations.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationObject AttachmentAdultAnxietyArousalEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttachment stylesCognitive reappraisalECR-12Emotion regulationExpressive suppression

Identifiers

PMID38678214
PMCPMC11056069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.