Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678204›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Gynecological health and uptake of gynecological care after domestic or sexual violence: a qualitative study in an emergency shelter.

Elisabeth Iraola, Jean-Pierre Menard, Isabelle Buresi, Patrick Chariot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabeth IraolaInstitut de Recherche interdisciplinaire sur les Enjeux Sociaux (IRIS), UMR, CNRS U997 Inserm EHESS UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 8156-997, 93300, Aubervilliers, France. elisabeth.iraola@valdemarne.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5045-0048
Jean-Pierre MenardDirection de la protection maternelle et infantile et promotion de la santé, Conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne, 94000, Créteil, France.
Isabelle BuresiDirection de la protection maternelle et infantile et promotion de la santé, Conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne, 94000, Créteil, France.
Patrick ChariotInstitut de Recherche interdisciplinaire sur les Enjeux Sociaux (IRIS), UMR, CNRS U997 Inserm EHESS UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 8156-997, 93300, Aubervilliers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestic and sexual violence have been linked to adverse gynecological and obstetric outcomes. Survivors often find it difficult to verbalize such violence due to feelings of shame and guilt. Vulnerable or socially excluded women are frequently excluded from research, particularly qualitative studies on violence. This study aimed to characterize the perceived impact of domestic or sexual violence on the gynecological health and follow-up among women with complex social situations.

methodsWe analyzed the data following inductive thematic analysis methods.

resultsBetween April 2022 and January 2023, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews, lasting on average 90 min (range: 45-180), with women aged between 19 and 52, recruited in an emergency shelter in the Paris area. The women described physical and psychological violence mainly in the domestic sphere, their altered gynecological and mental health and their perception of gynecological care. The levels of uptake of gynecological care were related to the characteristics of the violence and their consequences. The description of gynecological examination was close to the description of coerced marital sexuality which was not considered to be sexual violence. Gynecological examination, likely to trigger embarrassment and discomfort, was always perceived to be necessary and justified, and consent was implied.

conclusionThis study can help question the appropriateness of professional practices related to the prevention of violence against women and gynecological examination practices. Any gynecological examination should be carried out within the framework of an equal relationship between caregiver and patient, for the general population and for women with a history of violence. It participates in preventing violence in the context of care, and more widely, in preventing violence against women.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchSex OffensesAdultDomestic ViolenceFemaleGynecological ExaminationGynecologyHumansMiddle AgedParisPatient Acceptance of Health CareYoung AdultDomestic violenceGynecological careIntimate partner violencePelvic examinationQualitative studySexual violence

Identifiers

PMID38678204
PMCPMC11055245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.