Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678202›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Thriving from work questionnaire: Spanish translation and validation.

Susan E Peters, Daniel A Gundersen, Stephanie M Neidlinger, Jim Ritchie-Dunham, Gregory R Wagner

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan E PetersCenter for Work, Health, and Well-being, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. sepeters@hsph.harvard.edu.
Daniel A GundersenCenter for Work, Health, and Well-being, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephanie M NeidlingerCenter for Work, Health, and Well-being, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jim Ritchie-DunhamCenter for Work, Health, and Well-being, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Gregory R WagnerCenter for Work, Health, and Well-being, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

The Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Center for Work, Health and WellbeingU19OH008861 · OH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2007 to 2025
$23.9M
NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH008861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThriving from Work is a construct that has been highlighted as an important integrative positive worker well-being indicator that can be used in both research and practice. Recent public discourse emphasizes the important contributions that work should have on workers' lives in positive and meaningful ways and the importance of valid and reliable instruments to measure worker well-being. The Thriving from Work Questionnaire measures how workers' experiences of their work and conditions of work contributes in positive ways to their thriving both at and outside of work.

methodsThe purpose of this study was to translate the Thriving from Work Questionnaire from English to Spanish, and then validate the translated questionnaire in a sample of 8,795 finance workers in Peru and Mexico. We used item response theory models replicating methods that were used for the original validation studies. We conducted a differential item functioning analysis to evaluate any differences in the performance of models between Peru and Mexico. We evaluated criterion validity with organizational leadership, flourishing, vitality, community well-being, and worker's home location socio-economic position.

resultsThe current study demonstrates that the Spanish (Peru/Mexico) questionnaire was found to be a reliable and valid measure of workers' thriving from work. One item was dropped from the long-form version of the original U.S. questionnaire. Both the long and short form versions of the questionnaire had similar psychometric properties. Empirical reliability was high. Criterion validity was established as hypothesized relationships between constructs was supported. There were no differences in the performance of the model between countries suggesting utility across Latin American countries.

conclusionsThe current study demonstrated that the Spanish (Peru and Mexico) version of the questionnaire is both a reliable and valid measure of worker well-being in Latin America. Specific recommendations are made for the adaptation of the questionnaire and directions of future research.

Indexed as

TranslationsAdultFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMexicoMiddle AgedPeruPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesDecent workFlourishingHealthy work designLatin AmericaMeasurementPsychological well-beingPsychometricsQuality of lifeScale developmentWorker well-being

Identifiers

PMID38678202
PMCPMC11055305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.