ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Patient's self-reported quality of life as a prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma initially treated with TKI: nomogram proposal.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Head-to-head comparison of TKI and CPI first-line treatment strategies in advanced renal cell carcinoma-Real-world data from the German research platform CARAT.International journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- Differences at diagnosis between long-term survivors and not long-term survivors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma initially treated with TKI.The Canadian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor for the article "Patient's self‑reported quality of life as a prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma initially treated with TKI: nomogram proposal".World journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous prognostic factors have been described for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). There are nomograms to assist in clinical decision-making and inform patients of their disease progression. However, they have a limited capacity and moderate concordance rates. Performance status (PS) is one of the most widely used prognostic factors and most closely related to overall survival (OS), but this is a subjective assessment based solely on the clinician's opinion. Patients must be at the center of care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have shown benefits but are not widespread in daily clinical practice.
methodsWe analyzed 78 consecutive patients diagnosed with mRCC who initiated treatment at our institution between September 2012 and September 2019. We performed a descriptive analysis of the sample's baseline characteristics and the NCCN FKSI 19 questionnaire. We also conducted a survival analysis.
resultsThe baseline FKSI 19 score demonstrates its prognostic potential, HR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.97). Our prognostic model would include: FKSI < 58 (HR 3.61 95% CI 1.97-6.61), anemia, thrombocytosis, non-clear cell histology, and metastatic hepatic involvement. AUC 0.86 (95%CI 0.77-0.95).
conclusionAlthough it would need external validation, the proposed nomogram could be an alternative to other previously described models. The NCCN FKSI 19 baseline score could replace the clinician's subjective determination of PS. CLINICAL
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38678165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.