ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Antiangiogenic potential of phytochemicals from Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn investigated through in silico and quantum computational methods.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational analysis of miRNA mediated KDR gene regulation and natural VEGFR2 inhibitors from Persicaria hydropiper in hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Carvacrol Effectively InhibitsFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Suppressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptor (VEGFR2), and the VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling cascade system to inhibit angiogenesis has emerged as a possible cancer therapeutic target. The present work was designed to discover and evaluate bioactive phytochemicals from the Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn plant for their anti-angiogenic potential. Molecular docking of twenty-one phytochemicals against the VEGFR-2 (PDB ID: 3VHE) protein was performed, followed by ADMET profiling and molecular docking simulations. These investigations unveiled two hit compounds, cirsimaritin (- 12.29 kcal/mol) and salvigenin (- 12.14 kcal/mol), with the highest binding energy values when compared to the reference drug, Sorafenib (- 15.14 kcal/mol). Furthermore, only nine phytochemicals (cirsimaritin and salvigenin included) obeyed Lipinski's rule of five and passed ADMET filters. Molecular dynamics simulations run over 100 ns revealed that the protein-ligand complexes remained stable with minimal backbone fluctuations. The binding free energy values of cirsimaritin (- 52.35 kcal/mol) and salvigenin (- 55.89 kcal/mol), deciphered by MM-GBSA analyses, further corroborated the docking interactions. The HOMO-LUMO band energy gap (ΔE) was calculated using density-functional theory (DFT) and substantiated using density of state (DOS) spectra. The chemical reactivity analyses revealed that salvigenin exhibited the highest chemical softness value (6.384 eV), the lowest hardness value (0.07831 eV), and the lowest ΔE value (0.1566 eV), which implies salvigenin was less stable and chemically more reactive than cirsimaritin and sorafenib. These findings provide further evidence that cirsimaritin and salvigenin have the ability to prevent angiogenesis and the development of cancer. Nevertheless, more in vitro and in vivo confirmation is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.