Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678132›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2025

In-silico prediction of dislodgeable foliar residues and regulatory implications for plant protection products.

Yi Shi, Kanak Choudhury, Xiaoyi Sopko, Sarah Adham, Edward Chikwana

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi ShiDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Kanak ChoudhuryCorteva Agriscience LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN, 46268, USA.
Xiaoyi SopkoCorteva Agriscience LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN, 46268, USA.
Sarah AdhamCorteva Agriscience LLC, Abingdon, OX14 4RY, United Kingdom.
Edward ChikwanaCorteva Agriscience LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN, 46268, USA. edward.chikwana@corteva.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-0285
Corteva (United States) · USSidney & Lois Eskenazi Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen experimentally determined dislodgeable foliar residue (DFR) values are not available, regulatory agencies use conservative default DFR values as a first-tier approach to assess post-application dermal exposures to plant protection products (PPPs). These default values are based on a limited set of field studies, are very conservative, and potentially overestimate exposures from DFRs.

objectiveUse Random Forest to develop classification and regression-type ensemble models to predict DFR values after last application (DFR0) by considering experimentally-based variability due to differences in physical and chemical properties of PPPs, agronomic practices, crop type, and climatic conditions.

methodsRandom Forest algorithm was used to develop in-silico ensemble DFR0 prediction models using more than 100 DFR studies from Corteva Agriscience

resultsThe proposed ensemble models demonstrated 98% prediction accuracy that if a DFR0 is predicted to be less than the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) default DFR0 value of 3 µg/cm IMPACT STATEMENT: This manuscript is expected to have significant impact globally as it provides: A framework for incorporating in silico DFR data into worker exposure assessment, A roadmap for a tiered approach for conducting re-entry exposure assessment, and A proof of concept for using existing DFR data to provide a read-across framework that can easily be harmonized across all regulatory agencies to provide more robust assessments for PPP exposures.

Indexed as

Pesticide ResiduesPlant LeavesAlgorithmsComputer SimulationCrops, AgriculturalHumansRisk AssessmentPesticide ResiduesDermal ExposureDislodgeable Foliar Residues (DFR) PredictionIn-silico ModelPost-application ExposureRandom ForestWorker Exposure

Identifiers

PMID38678132
PMCPMC12401724
OpenAlexW4395695444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.