Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678100›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Efficient diagnosis of psoriasis and lichen planus cutaneous diseases using deep learning approach.

Arshia Eskandari, Mahkame Sharbatdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arshia EskandariFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mahkame SharbatdarFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. m.sharbatdar@kntu.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tendency of skin diseases to manifest in a unique and yet similar appearance, absence of enough competent dermatologists, and urgency of diagnosis and classification on time and accurately, makes the need of machine aided diagnosis blatant. This study is conducted with the purpose of broadening the research in skin disease diagnosis with computer by traversing the capabilities of deep Learning algorithms to classify two skin diseases noticeably close in appearance, Psoriasis and Lichen Planus. The resemblance between these two skin diseases is striking, often resulting in their classification within the same category. Despite this, there is a dearth of research focusing specifically on these diseases. A customized 50 layers ResNet-50 architecture of convolutional neural network is used and the results are validated through fivefold cross-validation, threefold cross-validation, and random split. By utilizing advanced data augmentation and class balancing techniques, the diversity of the dataset has increased, and the dataset imbalance has been minimized. ResNet-50 has achieved an accuracy of 89.07%, sensitivity of 86.46%, and specificity of 86.02%. With their promising results, these algorithms make the potential of machine aided diagnosis clear. Deep Learning algorithms could provide assistance to physicians and dermatologists by classification of skin diseases, with similar appearance, in real-time.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLichen PlanusPsoriasisAlgorithmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerDeep learning in dermatologyDiagnosisLichen planusPsoriasisResNet-50 model

Identifiers

PMID38678100
PMCPMC11055920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.