Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678076›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Application of ultrasound to monitor in vivo residual bone movement within transtibial prosthetic sockets.

Niels Jonkergouw, Maarten R Prins, Daniël Donse, Peter van der Wurff, Jaap H van Dieën, Arjan Buis, Han Houdijk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Niels JonkergouwDepartment of Orthopaedic Technology, Military Rehabilitation Centre Aardenburg, Korte Molenweg 3, 3941 PW, Doorn, The Netherlands. n.jonkergouw@mrcdoorn.nl.
Maarten R PrinsDepartment of Orthopaedic Technology, Military Rehabilitation Centre Aardenburg, Korte Molenweg 3, 3941 PW, Doorn, The Netherlands.
Daniël DonseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Peter van der WurffDepartment of Orthopaedic Technology, Military Rehabilitation Centre Aardenburg, Korte Molenweg 3, 3941 PW, Doorn, The Netherlands.
Jaap H van DieënDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan BuisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Strathclyde University, Scotland, UK.
Han HoudijkDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Central Military Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLDelft University of Technology · NLUniversity of Strathclyde · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Stichting ZiektenkostenVerzekering Krijgsmacht 20-0231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transtibial prosthetic users do often struggle to achieve an optimal prosthetic fit, leading to residual limb pain and stump-socket instability. Prosthetists face challenges in objectively assessing the impact of prosthetic adjustments on residual limb loading. Understanding the mechanical behaviour of the pseudo-joint formed by the residual bone and prosthesis may facilitate prosthetic adjustments and achieving optimal fit. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using B-mode ultrasound to monitor in vivo residual bone movement within a transtibial prosthetic socket during different stepping tasks. Five transtibial prosthesis users participated, and ultrasound images were captured using a Samsung HM70A system during five dynamic conditions. Bone movement relative to the socket was quantified by tracking the bone contour using Adobe After-Effect. During the study a methodological adjustment was made to improve data quality, and the first two participants were excluded from analysis. The remaining three participants exhibited consistent range of motion, with a signal to noise ratio ranging from 1.12 to 2.59. Medial-lateral and anterior-posterior absolute range of motion varied between 0.03 to 0.88 cm and 0.14 to 0.87 cm, respectively. This study demonstrated that it is feasible to use B-mode ultrasound to monitor in vivo residual bone movement inside an intact prosthetic socket during stepping tasks.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsTibiaUltrasonographyAdultAgedAmputation StumpsAmputeesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID38678076
PMCPMC11055853
OpenAlexW4395689410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.