Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678074›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Differences in cardiovascular risk and health-related quality of life in COPD patients according to clinical phenotype.

Ana Muñoz Montiel, Pedro Ruiz-Esteban, Adolfo Doménech Del Río, Pedro Valdivielso, Miguel Ángel Sánchez Chaparro, Casilda Olveira

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Muñoz MontielPulmonology Service. Monographic COPD Office, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Pedro Ruiz-EstebanNephrology Department, The Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND), Regional University Hospital of Malaga, University of Malaga, RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0012), Malaga, Spain. pedro_ruiz_esteban@hotmail.com.
Adolfo Doménech Del RíoPulmonology Service. Monographic COPD Office, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Pedro ValdivielsoLaboratory of Lipids and Atherosclerosis, Medico-Sanitarias Research Center (IBIMA), University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Sánchez ChaparroInternal Medicine, University Hospital Virgen de La Victoria, Department of Medicine and Dermatology and Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Platform Bionand, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Casilda OlveiraPulmonology Service, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Department of Medicine and Dermatology and Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Platform Bionand, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a high prevalence and a major impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). COPD exacerbations are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting cardiovascular risk, and are associated with poorer health status. The aim of this study was to assess the association between cardiovascular risk (CVR) and HRQL, according to exacerbator or non-exacerbator phenotype. We undertook a cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study of 107 patients with COPD. Patients with two or more moderate exacerbations or one severe exacerbation in the previous year were considered as exacerbators. The CVR was calculated with the Framingham scale and SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) and the HRQL was assessed with the generic questionnaire Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Statistical analysis was done with SPSS version 26.0 for Windows. The SF-36 and the SGRQ showed lower values for the exacerbator phenotype, indicating a poorer quality of life. The CAT questionnaire showed values above 10 for the exacerbator phenotype, and lower values in the non-exacerbator group. After categorizing the sample according to their median age (65 years), we found a greater deterioration in HRQL in patients under 65 years of age according to the SF-36, the SGRQ and the CAT. We also detected differences in HRQL between non-exacerbator patients with a high CVR according to the Framingham (≥ 20%) and SCORE (≥ 5%) scales compared to those without this risk. A tendency towards worse HRQL was observed in non-exacerbator patients with a high CVR, which was statistically significant for the SGRQ impact domain on the SCORE scale. The CAT also showed a worse quality of life in non-exacerbator patients with a high CVR, which was significant in the Framingham model (Framingham high risk 8.41 vs non-high risk 6.05, p < 0.01). These differences were not observed in exacerbator patients. Our findings confirm that a high CVR influences HRQL in patients with COPD, especially in non-exacerbator patients with a high CVR, measured according to the SGRQ and the CAT.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPhenotypePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesCardiovascular riskCOPDCOPD exacerbationHealth-related quality of lifePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID38678074
PMCPMC11055945
OpenAlexW4395691671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.