ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction-error-dependent processing of immediate and delayed positive feedback.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emotional Context Modulates Neural Prediction-Error Encoding.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- From Feedback-Learning to Semantic Memory: Can Feedback-Related Brain Activity Predict Object-Word Associations?Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Modulation of feedback-related negativity by objective and subjective response correctness.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Action or Stimulus: Individual Beliefs About Learned Associations Influence the Processing of Immediate and Delayed Feedback.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Preventing late corrections reveals anticipatory motor control.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- Links Between Altered Feedback Learning and Symptoms of Depression: Insights From the FRN and Feedback-Locked N170.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Altered Reward Processing in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Insights From Active and Observational Learning.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Impaired reinforcement learning and coding of prediction errors in patients with cerebellar degeneration - a study with EEG and voxel-based morphometry.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the NPU-Reward Task.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- The Role of the N170 in Linking Stimuli to Feedback-Effects of Stimulus Modality and Feedback Delay.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning often involves trial-and-error, i.e. repeating behaviours that lead to desired outcomes, and adjusting behaviour when outcomes do not meet our expectations and thus lead to prediction errors (PEs). PEs have been shown to be reflected in the reward positivity (RewP), an event-related potential (ERP) component between 200 and 350 ms after performance feedback which is linked to striatal processing and assessed via electroencephalography (EEG). Here we show that this is also true for delayed feedback processing, for which a critical role of the hippocampus has been suggested. We found a general reduction of the RewP for delayed feedback, but the PE was similarly reflected in the RewP and the later P300 for immediate and delayed positive feedback, while no effect was found for negative feedback. Our results suggest that, despite processing differences between immediate and delayed feedback, positive PEs drive feedback processing and learning irrespective of delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.