ArticleScientific reports2024
Mechanical shock test simulation analysis of butterfly valves developed for the naval defense industry and evaluation of real test and production data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the mechanical shock behavior and develop the shock resistance of widely preferred butterfly valves for navy defense industries by handling the real test results with computer aided design and simulation programs. The 2D and 3D drawings were realized by using solid modeling and design programs. Mechanical analyzes to determine the mechanical strength of the specimens were carried out with the finite element analysis method by using structural simulation program. Mechanical shock test simulations were carried out by with shock response spectrum analysis. Solidification, filling-time-temperature analyzes, and simulation studies of inner stresses caused by micro and macro shrinkages were performed by using the casting simulation program. Comparisons of virtual tests simulated in computer environment with real tests were done in shock test setup. Products made of bronze were preferred due to the high corrosion resistance and the desire to be a useful research article that can respond to common applications in the defense industry. Virtual shock test simulation and real shock tests were performed according to the MIL STD 810 standard. The shock test results observations showed that by revising the design with a safety factor of 18% on the specimen, it was ensured that the product could pass the mechanical shock test even at an acceleration of 4000 m/s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.