ArticleInternational dental journal2024
Familiarity with ChatGPT Features Modifies Expectations and Learning Outcomes of Dental Students.
Article in International dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effectiveness of GAI-assisted teaching methods in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of generative AI on health professional education: A systematic review in the context of student learning.Medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping Current Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacology Education via a Scoping Review.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence chatbots in endodontic education-Concepts and potential applications.International endodontic journal · 2026Review
- Effects of ChatGPT-generated immediate feedback integrated into VR-based OSCEs on nursing students' performance: a randomized crossover study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Psychological Inclinations and Practical Utility of ChatGPT Among Undergraduate Dental Students at a Dental School in Karachi: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility and exploratory assessment of large language models for pediatric dentistry queries: a comparative study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Applications and potential of ChatGPT in dentistry: Scoping review of research perspectives.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- A Scoping Review of Large Language Models in Dental Education: Applications, Challenges, and Prospects.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Application of large language models in oral health education: a review of the literature.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2025Review
- Assessing the Utility of Large Language Models in Guiding Dental Practitioners on Pediatric Patient Care: A Comparative AI Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Orthodontic Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Teaching Application.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Knowledge and use, perceptions of benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence chatbots among Italian physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional national study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- ChatGPT's Influence on Dental Education: Methodological Challenges and Ethical Considerations.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Related Dental Research: Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Developing a consent checklist for AI in dentistry: Thematic analysis and pilot survey validation.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe number of approvals for AI-based systems is increasing rapidly, although AI clinical trial designs lack consideration of the impact of human-AI interaction. Aim of this work was to investigate how reading of an AI system (ChatGPT) features/descriptions could influence the willingness and expectations for use of this technology as well as dental students' learning performance.
methodsDental students (N = 104) were asked to learn about side effects of drugs used in dental practice via reading recommended literature or ChatGPT. Expectations towards ChatGPT were measured by survey, before and after reading of a system features description, whilst learning outcomes were evaluated via pharmacology quiz.
resultsStudents who used ChatGPT (YG group) showed better results on the pharmacology quiz than students who neither read the description nor employed ChatGPT for learning (NN condition). Moreover, students who read the description of ChatGPT features yet did not use it (NG) showed better results on the pharmacology quiz compared with the NN condition, although none of them employed ChatGPT for learning. The NG students compared to the YG students had less trust in AI system assistance in learning, and after the AI system description reading, their expectations changed significantly, showing an association with quiz scores.
conclusionsA majority of students in our cohort was reluctant to use ChatGPT. Furthermore, familarity (reading) with ChatGPT features appear to alter the expectations and enhance learning performance of students.suggesting an AI description-related cognitive bias. Hence the content description of ChatGPTshould be reviewed and verified prior to AI system use for educational purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.