Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38677519›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2024

Environmental sustainability of diets among children and adolescents in the German DONALD cohort study: age and time trends, and nutrient adequacy.

Karen van de Locht, Ines Perrar, Juliana Minetto Gellert Paris, Maike Elena Schnermann, Kolade Oluwagbemigun, Ute Alexy, Ute Nöthlings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Choice architecture in institutional food services: strategies to promote sustainable nutrition].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen van de LochtInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Department of Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ines PerrarInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Department of Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Juliana Minetto Gellert ParisCenter for Development Research (ZEF), Department of Economic and Technological Change, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maike Elena SchnermannInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Department of Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kolade OluwagbemigunInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Department of Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ute AlexyInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Department of Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ute NöthlingsInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Department of Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: noethlings@uni-bonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying diets beneficial for both human and planetary health has become increasingly important. However, to date, there is limited research on sustainable diets for children and adolescents, a vulnerable population group with specific nutritional needs.

objectivesWe aimed to identify 1) the main determinants; 2) age and time trends of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), land use (LU), and water use (WU) of diets of children and adolescents; and 3) analyze the associations of dietary GHGE, LU, and WU with nutrient adequacy.

methodsA total of 5510 3-d-weighted dietary records (n = 856; 6-17 y; 48% ♀) of the DONALD (DOrtmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed) study between 2000 and 2021 were analyzed. Values of GHGE (kgCO

resultsThe main contributors to GHGE and LU were meat products (GHGE: 25.6%; LU: 32.8%), dairy products (22.2%; 17.7%), and sweets and pastries (14.0%; 14.3%); to WU, nonalcoholic beverages (24.3%), meat products (18.9%), and vegetables and fruits (17.7%). GHGE, LU, and WU per 1000 kcal increased with age (P < 0.01). GHGE and LU per 1000 kcal increased between 2000 and 2010 and decreased after that in females (P < 0.01) and males (GHGE only: P = 0.02). No significant time trend was found for WU (P > 0.05). A higher MAR was directly associated with GHGE/1000 kcal (MAR: β: 0.011, 95% CI: 0.008, 0.013, P < 0.0001), LU/1000 kcal (MAR: β: 0.009, 95%CI: 0.005, 0.013, P < 0.0001), and WU/1000 kcal (MAR: β: 0.429, 95% CI: 0.325, 0.533, P < 0.0001).

conclusionsOur findings underscore the further need and the capacity for change toward more environmentally sustainable diets. Yet, the tradeoff between environmental sustainability and nutrient adequacy in the diets of children and adolescents requires specific attention to dietary composition.

Indexed as

DietAdolescentChildCohort StudiesConservation of Natural ResourcesFemaleGermanyGreenhouse GasesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNutritional StatusNutritive ValueGreenhouse Gasesage trendschildren and adolescentsdietenvironmental sustainabilitygreenhouse gas emissionsland uselife cycle assessmentnutrient adequacytime trendswater use

Identifiers

PMID38677519
PMCPMC11291386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.