Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676943›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs for the Management of Bloodstream Infection: What Is Their Relative Contribution to Improving Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Anna Maria Peri, Mark D Chatfield, Weiping Ling, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Patrick N A Harris, David L Paterson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07684300 (Impact of Molecular Microbiology Integrated With Clinical Data on Antimicrobial Therapy Optimization), which is not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07684300 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Molecular Microbiology Integrated With Clinical Data on Antimicrobial Therapy Optimization: An Open-Label Cluster-Randomized Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaria Espinosa PerezRan2026 to 2027Enrolled250ConditionsInfection, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Antimicrobial Resistance, Multiplex PCRArmsProtocolized Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy, Standard Antimicrobial Stewardship
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Impact of the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A Difference-in-Differences Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. A review of bloodstream infections-pathogens, pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, treatment methods-challenges and future aspects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comparative analytical performance of Autof MS2600 and Biotyper Sirius for rapid MALDI-TOF MS identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of a combined rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) and lateral flow immunochromatographic assay-based workflow for bloodstream infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Anna Maria PeriThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7704-4728
Mark D ChatfieldThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Weiping LingThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Luis Furuya-KanamoriThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Patrick N A HarrisThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David L PatersonThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence about the clinical impact of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections is limited, and whether RDT are superior to conventional blood cultures (BCs) embedded within antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is unknown.

methodsWe performed network meta-analyses using results from studies of patients with bloodstream infection with the aim of comparing the clinical impact of RDT (applied on positive BC broth or whole blood) to conventional BC, both assessed with and without ASP with respect to mortality, length of stay (LOS), and time to optimal therapy.

resultsEighty-eight papers were selected, including 25 682 patient encounters. There was an appreciable amount of statistical heterogeneity within each meta-analysis. The network meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in mortality associated with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC alone (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .59-.87) and with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC + ASP (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, .63-.96). No benefit in survival was found associated with the use of RDT alone nor with BC + ASP compared to BC alone. A reduction in LOS was associated with RDT + ASP versus BC alone (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, .84-.98) whereas no difference in LOS was shown between any other groups. A reduced time to optimal therapy was shown when RDT + ASP was compared to BC alone (-29 hours; 95% CI, -35 to -23), BC + ASP (-18 hours; 95% CI, -27 to -10), and to RDT alone (-12 hours; 95% CI, -20 to -3).

conclusionsThe use of RDT + ASP may lead to a survival benefit even when introduced in settings already adopting effective ASP in association with conventional BC.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipRapid Diagnostic TestsSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CultureHumansLength of StayTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial stewardshipblood culturebloodstream infectionnetwork meta-analysisrapid diagnostic tests

Identifiers

PMID38676943
PMCPMC11327801
OpenAlexW4395958405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.