Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676888›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Conventional Method of Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice.

Sunghye Cho, Dongtak Jeong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sunghye ChoDepartment of Medicinal & Life Science, College of Science and Convergence Technology, Hanyang University-ERICA, Ansan, South Korea.
Dongtak JeongDepartment of Medicinal & Life Science, College of Science and Convergence Technology, Hanyang University-ERICA, Ansan, South Korea. cooljdt@hanyang.ac.kr.
Hanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) after myocardial ischemia, cardiac surgery, or circulatory arrest leads to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Primarily, no blood flow to the heart causes an imbalance between oxygen demand and supply, namely, ischemia, resulting in damage or dysfunction of the cardiac tissue. Early restoration of blood flow has been established to be the treatment of choice to prevent further tissue injury. Indeed, the use of thrombolytic therapy or primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the most effective strategy for reducing the size of a myocardial infarct and improving the clinical outcome. Unfortunately, restoring blood flow to the ischemic myocardium, named reperfusion, can also contribute to injury. This phenomenon was therefore termed myocardial IRI. Subsequent studies in animal models of acute myocardial infarction suggest that myocardial IRI accounts for up to 50% of the final size of a myocardial infarct. Consequently, many researchers aim to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of myocardial IRI to find therapeutic strategies that ultimately reduce the final infarct size. Despite numerous therapeutic strategies identified in laboratories, no clinical medicine specifically targeting IRI has yet been approved. Therefore, more relevant research is needed to develop promising therapeutic agents. In this respect, we will introduce a solid and reproducible experimental protocol to induce myocardial IRI in mice and test potent drug transfer during this surgical procedure.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryAnimalsMiceMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumDirect gene deliveryMouse I/R modelMyocardial intramuscular injectionMyocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion InjuryROSSurgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID38676888
OpenAlexW4395698782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.