Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676748›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Robotic assisted surgery reduces ergonomic risk during minimally invasive colorectal resection: the VOLCANO randomised controlled trial.

Frances Dixon, Parveen Vitish-Sharma, Achal Khanna, Barrie D Keeler, VOLCANO Trial Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05262296 (A Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Ergonomics of Laparoscopic and Versius Robotic Assisted Colorectal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05262296 completednot on this map

A Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Ergonomics of Laparoscopic and Versius Robotic Assisted Colorectal Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorJoanne TurnerRan2022 to 2024Enrolled61ConditionsColorectal DisordersArmsLaparoscopic Surgeon, Robotic Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Robotic Surgery in Australasian Gynaecology: Results of a 2025 Cross-Sectional Survey.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frances DixonDepartment of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK. Frances.Dixon@mkuh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4682-6839
Parveen Vitish-SharmaDepartment of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK.
Achal KhannaDepartment of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK.
Barrie D KeelerDepartment of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK.
VOLCANO Trial Group
Milton Keynes Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive surgery benefits patients but poor operating ergonomics causes musculoskeletal injuries in surgeons. This randomised controlled trial aims to assess whether robotic-assisted surgery with the open-console Versius® system can reduce surgeons' ergonomic risks during major colorectal resections.

methodsProspectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05262296) in March 2022. Adult patients requiring a minimally invasive colorectal resection were potentially eligible. Photographs taken at 2-min intervals were analysed using the objective Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) posture analysis scale to calculate intraoperative surgeon ergonomic risk. Secondary outcomes included team communication (Oxford NOTECHS II), surgeon cognitive strain (modified NASA-TLX scale), and clinical outcomes.

resultsSixty patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio (40 robot, 20 laparoscopic). Mean age was 65yrs and 34 (57%) were male. Body Mass Index did not differ between the 2 groups (overall mean 29.0 ± 5) and there were equal proportions of left and right-colonic resections. REBA was significantly lower in the robotic arm (median robot REBA score 3 vs lap REBA 5 [p < 0.001]), equating to an injury risk category drop from "medium" to "low risk". There were no significant differences in team communication, operative duration, or patient outcomes. Surgeon cognitive strain was lower in robotic cases (mean robot 32.4 ± 10.3 vs lap 45.6 ± 14.3 [p < 0.001]).

conclusionsThis trial demonstrates that robotic surgery with an open-console system reduces ergonomic risk scores and cognitive strain during colorectal resections, with no apparent detriment to team communication. This may therefore be a safe & feasible solution to the increasing problem of work-related musculoskeletal injuries in surgeons.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedColectomyFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesSurgeonsColorectalErgonomicsMinimally Invasive SurgeryRobotic Surgery

Identifiers

PMID38676748
PMCPMC11055713
OpenAlexW4395695338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.