SynthesisSkeletal radiology2024
Diagnostic utility of 3D MRI sequences in the assessment of central, recess and foraminal stenoses of the spine: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Classification of lumbar spine disorders using large language models and MRI segmentation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo perform a systematic literature review on the diagnostic utility of 3D MRI sequences in the assessment of central canal, recess and foraminal stenosis in the spine.
methodsThe databases PubMed, MEDLINE (via OVID) and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched for studies that investigated the diagnostic use of 3D MRI to evaluate stenoses in various parts of the spine in humans. Three reviewers examined the literature and conducted systematic review according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
resultsThirty studies were retrieved from 2 595 publications for this systematic review. The overall diagnostic performance of 3D MRI outperformed the conventional 2D MRI with reported sensitivities ranging from 79 to 100% and specificities ranging from 86 to 100% regarding the evaluation of central, recess and foraminal stenoses. In general, high level of agreement (both intra- and interrater) regarding visibility and pathology on 3D sequences was reported. Studies show that well-optimized 3D sequences allow the use of higher spatial resolution, similar scan time and increased SNR and CNR when compared to corresponding 2D sequences. However, the benefit of 3D sequences is in the additional information provided by them and in the possibility to save total protocol scan times.
conclusionThe literature on the spine 3D MRI assessment of stenoses is heterogeneous with varying MRI protocols and diagnostic results. However, the 3D sequences offer similar or superior detection of stenoses with high reliability. Especially, the advantage of 3D MRI seems to be the better evaluation of recess stenoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.