ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Improvement of coronary stent visualization using ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photon-counting detector CT for follow-up after TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma: effects of reconstruction kernel and sharpness.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- In vivo coronary stent evaluation using photon-counting computed tomography: diagnostic performance.European radiology · 2026Article
- Increasing pulmonary artery visibility and diagnostic confidence with ultra-high resolution photon-counting detector CT pulmonary angiography.European radiology · 2026Article
- Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT Angiography for Noninvasive Detection of Neurovascular In-Stent Restenosis.Stroke · 2026Article
- Clinical benefits and current challenges of photon-counting detector CT in vascular imaging.Radiology advances · 2026Review
- Ultra-high resolution photon-counting detector coronary CT angiography: diagnostic accuracy in patients with high Agatston scores.European radiology · 2026Article
- Optimizing Reconstruction Parameters for Detecting Peripheral In-Stent Restenosis with Photon-Counting Detector CT: A Phantom Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of photon-counting and energy-integrating detector CT to identify obstructive coronary artery disease.European radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Photon-Counting CT Angiography in Vascular Stenosis Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Photon-Counting CT in Cardiovascular Imaging: Clinical Applications.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Cardiac imaging using photon counting CT - benefits, challenges and prospects.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- A review of the pathogenic mechanism and clinical management progress of in-stent calcification restenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Spectral ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting CT for coronary stent imaging: evaluation in a dynamic phantom.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Photon counting CT improves coronary stent imaging and fat attenuation index assessment across reconstruction modes.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Photon-Counting CT-Angiography to Assess Intracranial Stents and Flow Diverters in Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Coronary angiography with photon-counting detector CT-new options and some critical decisions.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Photon-counting detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary stents and in-stent restenosis.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Photon-counting detector CT angiography to evaluate carotid and subclavian artery stents and compared to ultrasound and angiography - an in-vivo study with spectral reconstructions.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Joint CT reconstruction of anatomy and implants using a mixed prior model.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing cardiac imaging: how photon-counting computed tomography is redefining coronary artery stent assessmentDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of standard-resolution (SR) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) based on photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) of coronary stents and explore the best reconstruction kernel for stent imaging.
methodsFrom July 2023 to September 2023, patients were enrolled to undergo CCTA using a dual-source PCD-CT system after coronary angioplasty with stent placement. SR images with a slice thickness/increment of 0.6/0.4 mm were reconstructed using a vascular kernel (Bv48), while UHR images with a slice thickness/increment of 0.2/0.2 mm were reconstructed using vascular kernels of six sharpness levels (Bv48, Bv56, Bv60, Bv64, Bv72, and Bv76). The in-stent lumen diameters were evaluated. Subjective image quality was also evaluated by a 5-point Likert scale. Invasive coronary angiography was conducted in 12 patients (25 stents).
resultsSixty-nine patients (68.0 [61.0, 73.0] years, 46 males) with 131 stents were included. All UHR images had significantly larger in-stent lumen diameter than SR images (p < 0.001). Specifically, UHR-Bv72 and UHR-Bv76 for in-stent lumen diameter (2.17 [1.93, 2.63] mm versus 2.20 [1.93, 2.59] mm) ranked the two best kernels. The subjective analysis demonstrated that UHR-Bv72 images had the most pronounced effect on reducing blooming artifacts, showcasing in-stent lumen and stent demonstration, and diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001). Furthermore, SR and UHR-Bv72 images showed a diagnostic accuracy of 78.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.3%-92.5%) and 88.0% (95%CI: 68.8%-97.5%), respectively.
conclusionUHR CCTA by PCD-CT leads to significantly improved visualization and diagnostic performance of coronary stents, and Bv72 is the optimal reconstruction kernel showing the stent struts and in-stent lumen. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The significantly improved visualization of coronary stents using ultra-high resolution CCTA could increase the diagnostic accuracy for in-stent restenosis and avoid unnecessary invasive quantitative coronary angiography, thus changing the clinical management for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. KEY POINTS: Coronary stent imaging is challenging with energy-integrating detector CT due to "blooming artifacts." UHR images using a PCD-CT enhanced coronary stent visualization. UHR coronary stent imaging demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.