ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Supramaximal resection: retrospective study on IDH-wildtype Glioblastomas based on the new RANO-Resect classification.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to predict tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic revalidation of RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma: a reconstruction of individual patient data.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Assessment of the RANO-resect criteria in elderly patients with glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Glioblastoma in adults: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Impact of maximal and supramaximal resections on postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging changes and clinical outcomes in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2009-2025: Broad scope and implementation-A progress report.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Molecular-based decision-making in glioblastoma surgery: When to aim for supramaximal resection.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Targeting the glioblastoma resection margin with locoregional nanotechnologies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a clinical risk model for postoperative outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- The role of Lobectomy in Glioblastoma management: A Retrospective series.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Article
- Population-based validation of the RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of the extent of resection in the management of Glioblastoma is a long-debated topic, recently widened by the 2022 RANO-Resect Classification, which advocates for the resection of the non-enhancing disease surrounding the main core of tumors (supramaximal resection, SUPR) to achieve additional survival benefits. We conducted a retrospective analysis to corroborate the role of SUPR by the RANO-Resect Classification in a single center, homogenous cohort of patients.
methodsRecords of patients operated for WHO-2021 Glioblastomas at our institution between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed; volumetric data of resected lesions were computed and classified by RANO-Resect criteria. Survival and correlation analyses were conducted excluding patients below near-total resection.
results117 patients met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 45 near-total resections (NTR), 31 complete resections (CR), and 41 SUPR. Median progression-free and overall survival were 11 and 15 months for NTR, 13 and 17 months or CR, 20 and 24 months for SUPR, respectively (p < 0.001), with inverse correlation observed between survival and FLAIR residual volume (r -0.28). SUPR was not significantly associated with larger preoperative volumes or higher rates of postoperative deficits, although it was less associated with preoperative neurological deficits (OR 3.37, p = 0.003). The impact of SUPR on OS varied between MGMT unmethylated (HR 0.606, p = 0.044) and methylated (HR 0.273, p = 0.002) patient groups.
conclusionsResults of the present study support the validity of supramaximal resection by the new RANO-Resect classification, also highlighting a possible surgical difference between tumors with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38676720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.