Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676660›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2024

Clinical role of abbreviated and ultrafast MRI in breast imaging.

Mario Juliano, Naziya Samreen, Celin Chacko, Samantha L Heller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mario JulianoUW Health Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53792, United States.
Naziya SamreenDepartment of Radiology, Confluence Health, Wenatchee, WA, 98802, United States.
Celin ChackoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, United States.
Samantha L HellerNYU Langone Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, NY, 10012, United States.
Columbia University · USNew York University · USUniversity of Wisconsin Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current breast cancer screening relies on mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound. In select populations, breast MRI is also of great utility. However, multiple factors limit widespread use of breast MRI for screening. Efforts have been made to increase the availability of breast MRI for screening, in large part due to the increased cancer detection rate of breast MRI compared to mammography. Techniques include shortening standard breast MRI protocols with the potential for accommodating MRI screening in a higher number of patients. This review will explain the role of abbreviated breast MRI and ultrafast breast MRI in breast imaging, and detail how these approaches differ from standard dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. In addition, limitations and advantages of these techniques will also be discussed.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMagnetic Resonance ImagingBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMammographyContrast MediaAbbreviated MRIBreast MRIUltrafast MRI

Identifiers

PMID38676660
PMCPMC11332674
OpenAlexW4395690228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.