Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676659›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2024

Proof-of-concept study of anti-Fel d 1 IgY antibodies in cat food using the MASK-air

Jean Bousquet, Alina Gherasim, Frédéric de Blay, Eve Mathieu-Dupas, Géraldine Batot, Daniel Laune, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Torsten Zuberbier, Nhân Pham-Thi, MASK‐cat study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05656482 (Evaluation of the Ability of a Cat Food to Reduce Respiratory Symptoms in Cat Allergic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05656482 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Ability of a Cat Food to Reduce Respiratory Symptoms in Cat Allergic Patients: Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMASK-air SASRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsRhinitis, AllergicArmsCats fed with PRO PLAN® LIVECLEAT®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Latest Findings in Immunoglobulin Y Technologies and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jean BousquetInstitute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-4766
Alina GherasimALYATEC, Nouvel hôpital Civil-Hôpitaux Universitaires, Stransbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-1396
Frédéric de BlayAllergy Division, Chest Disease Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Eve Mathieu-DupasKYomed INNOV, Montpellier, France.
Géraldine BatotKYomed INNOV, Montpellier, France.
Daniel LauneKYomed INNOV, Montpellier, France.
Bernardo Sousa-PintoMEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Torsten ZuberbierInstitute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-8875
Nhân Pham-ThiEcole Polytechnique de Palaiseau, Palaiseau, France.
MASK‐cat study group

Funding

Nestlé Purina Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn innovation to better manage cat-allergic patients utilises anti-Fel d 1 IgY antibodies to neutralise Fel d 1 after its production by the cat. However, there is no published study showing its clinical efficacy in humans in a home setting. A longitudinal, open-label, proof-of-concept study was carried out to approach clinical efficacy of the cat food in cat-allergic patients.

methodsAfter a baseline evaluation, the cats ate only the cat food for the following 4 months. Daily evaluation of efficacy was performed for 2 weeks at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 months of intervention for periods of 2 weeks. The MASK-air app was used daily to assess symptoms, work productivity and medications.

resultsOf the 49 patients screened, 42 were followed up and 33 (78.5%) reported MASK-air data at all 3 evaluation periods. The primary end point (visual analogue scale [VAS] for global allergy symptoms) was significantly improved (p < 0.0001). All symptoms (VAS nose, eye, and asthma), VAS work and the combined symptom-medication score significantly improved after 1 month. The percentage of uncontrolled days (VAS>20/100) decreased from 64% at baseline to 35% at 1 month (p < 0.0001) and 14% at 3 months. A sensitivity analysis in patients with uncontrolled disease at baseline found similar results. DISCUSSION: A cat diet containing anti-Fel d 1 antibodies was able to (i) show decreased allergic symptoms and related outcomes, (ii) inform the design and feasibility of future studies with a control arm and (iii) estimate the sample size of the study. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05656482.

Indexed as

anti‐Fel d 1 antibodiesasthmacat allergycat foodcombined symptom‐medication scoreconjunctivitisrhinitis

Identifiers

PMID38676659
PMCPMC11055507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.