Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676286›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of paediatric dentistry2025

Parental acceptability of silver diamine fluoride: The UK and US experiences.

Laura Timms, Sooji Choi, Zoe Marshman, Helen Rodd, Anne R Wilson, Tamanna Tiwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Knowledge and attitudes regarding silver diamine fluoride among Brazilian dentists: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Parental acceptability of silver diamine fluoride: The UK and US experiences.International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura TimmsSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2738-3406
Sooji ChoiChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Zoe MarshmanSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Helen RoddSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-2558
Anne R WilsonChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-8559
Tamanna TiwariSchool of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-4440

Funding

British Society of Paediatric DentistryRoyal College of Surgeons of England
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational data suggest that parents may have reservations about the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF).

aimThe aims of this study were to: (1) examine the acceptance of parents/carers towards the use of SDF for the management of caries in children's primary teeth in secondary care dental settings in the UK and the United States and (2) determine which factors may affect the acceptance of the use of SDF.

designThis was a cross-sectional questionnaire of SDF acceptability, completed by parents of young children. It was validated and adapted to local populations. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics.

resultsOf the 113 Sheffield parents, 73% reported that they would accept SDF treatment of children's posterior teeth, with 58% reporting this for anterior teeth. Parents having less concern about posterior aesthetics had a statistically significant effect on reported acceptance of SDF (p = .013). In the Colorado sample (n = 104), 72% reported that they would accept SDF on posterior teeth, and 58% reported that they would accept SDF on anterior teeth. Concerns about aesthetics had an effect on decreasing SDF acceptance overall (p = .0065) in anterior (p = .023) and posterior teeth (p = .108).

conclusionThe majority of parents in the two study populations accepted the treatment using SDF. However, concern about aesthetics had an influence on acceptability.

Indexed as

Cariostatic AgentsFluorides, TopicalParentsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver CompoundsAdultAttitude to HealthChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDental CariesEsthetics, DentalFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareCariostatic AgentsFluorides, TopicalQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver Compoundssilver diamine fluoridecaries managementcommunity paediatric dentistryminimally invasive dentistryrestorative dentistry/dental materials

Identifiers

PMID38676286
PMCPMC11626544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.