Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676258›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Personalized Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Wellbeing and Empathy in Healthcare Professionals.

Jason Nan, Matthew S Herbert, Suzanna Purpura, Andrea N Henneken, Dhakshin Ramanathan, Jyoti Mishra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason NanNeural Engineering and Translation Labs, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Matthew S HerbertDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Suzanna PurpuraNeural Engineering and Translation Labs, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Andrea N HennekenDepartment of Mental Health, VA San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
Dhakshin RamanathanNeural Engineering and Translation Labs, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Jyoti MishraNeural Engineering and Translation Labs, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-4557
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of California San Diego Medical Center · US

Funding

Hope for Depression Research Foundation N/AStein Institute for Research on Aging N/AT. Denny Sanford Institute for Empathy and Compassion N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare professionals are known to suffer from workplace stress and burnout, which can negatively affect their empathy for patients and quality of care. While existing research has identified factors associated with wellbeing and empathy in healthcare professionals, these efforts are typically focused on the group level, ignoring potentially important individual differences and implications for individualized intervention approaches. In the current study, we implemented N-of-1 personalized machine learning (PML) to predict wellbeing and empathy in healthcare professionals at the individual level, leveraging ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) and smartwatch wearable data. A total of 47 mood and lifestyle feature variables (relating to sleep, diet, exercise, and social connections) were collected daily for up to three months followed by applying eight supervised machine learning (ML) models in a PML pipeline to predict wellbeing and empathy separately. Predictive insight into the model architecture was obtained using Shapley statistics for each of the best-fit personalized models, ranking the importance of each feature for each participant. The best-fit model and top features varied across participants, with anxious mood (13/19) and depressed mood (10/19) being the top predictors in most models. Social connection was a top predictor for wellbeing in 9/12 participants but not for empathy models (1/7). Additionally, empathy and wellbeing were the top predictors of each other in 64% of cases. These findings highlight shared and individual features of wellbeing and empathy in healthcare professionals and suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to addressing modifiable factors to improve wellbeing and empathy will likely be suboptimal. In the future, such personalized models may serve as actionable insights for healthcare professionals that lead to increased wellness and quality of patient care.

Indexed as

EmpathyHealth PersonnelMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWearable Electronic DevicesEMAempathyhealthcare professionalsmachine learningN-of-1 modelwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID38676258
PMCPMC11053570
OpenAlexW4395002494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.