ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Cluster-Based Pairwise Contrastive Loss for Noise-Robust Speech Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses a joint training approach applied to a pipeline comprising speech enhancement (SE) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) models, where an acoustic tokenizer is included in the pipeline to leverage the linguistic information from the ASR model to the SE model. The acoustic tokenizer takes the outputs of the ASR encoder and provides a pseudo-label through K-means clustering. To transfer the linguistic information, represented by pseudo-labels, from the acoustic tokenizer to the SE model, a cluster-based pairwise contrastive (CBPC) loss function is proposed, which is a self-supervised contrastive loss function, and combined with an information noise contrastive estimation (infoNCE) loss function. This combined loss function prevents the SE model from overfitting to outlier samples and represents the pronunciation variability in samples with the same pseudo-label. The effectiveness of the proposed CBPC loss function is evaluated on a noisy LibriSpeech dataset by measuring both the speech quality scores and the word error rate (WER). The experimental results reveal that the proposed joint training approach using the described CBPC loss function achieves a lower WER than the conventional joint training approaches. In addition, it is demonstrated that the speech quality scores of the SE model trained using the proposed training approach are higher than those of the standalone-SE model and SE models trained using conventional joint training approaches. An ablation study is also conducted to investigate the effects of different combinations of loss functions on the speech quality scores and WER. Here, it is revealed that the proposed CBPC loss function combined with infoNCE contributes to a reduced WER and an increase in most of the speech quality scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.