Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676133›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Validity Verification of Human Pose-Tracking Algorithms for Gait Analysis Capability.

Tadamitsu Matsuda, Yuji Fujino, Hitoshi Makabe, Tomoyuki Morisawa, Tetsuya Takahashi, Kei Kakegawa, Takanari Matsumoto, Takehiko Kiyohara, Yasuo Torimoto, Masaki Miwa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tadamitsu MatsudaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Yuji FujinoGlobal Development Center, Development Department, Development Section, IMASEN Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Nagoya-shi 484-0083, Japan.
Hitoshi MakabeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8111-0823
Tomoyuki MorisawaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6344-7078
Tetsuya TakahashiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Kei KakegawaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Takanari MatsumotoGlobal Development Center, Development Department, Development Section, IMASEN Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Nagoya-shi 484-0083, Japan.
Takehiko KiyoharaGlobal Development Center, Development Department, Development Section, IMASEN Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Nagoya-shi 484-0083, Japan.
Yasuo TorimotoGlobal Development Center, Development Department, Development Section, IMASEN Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Nagoya-shi 484-0083, Japan.
Masaki MiwaGlobal Development Center, Development Department, Development Section, IMASEN Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Nagoya-shi 484-0083, Japan.
Toshiyuki FujiwaraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Hiroyuki DaidaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

IMASEN electric industrial Co. Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) clinical gait analysis systems are more affordable and portable than contemporary three-dimensional (3D) clinical models. Using the Vicon 3D motion capture system as the standard, we evaluated the internal statistics of the Imasen and open-source OpenPose gait measurement systems, both designed for 2D input, to validate their output based on the similarity of results and the legitimacy of their inner statistical processes. We measured time factors, distance factors, and joint angles of the hip and knee joints in the sagittal plane while varying speeds and gaits during level walking in three in-person walking experiments under normal, maximum-speed, and tandem scenarios. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the 2D models were greater than 0.769 for all gait parameters compared with those of Vicon, except for some knee joint angles. The relative agreement was excellent for the time-distance gait parameter and moderate-to-excellent for each gait motion contraction range, except for hip joint angles. The time-distance gait parameter was high for Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.899-0.993 but low for 0.298-0.971. Correlation coefficients were greater than 0.571 for time-distance gait parameters but lower for joint angle parameters, particularly hip joint angles. Our study elucidates areas in which to improve 2D models for their widespread clinical application.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGaitGait AnalysisHip JointKnee JointWalkingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMalePostureRange of Motion, Articulargaithuman pose estimationmotion analysisvalidation

Identifiers

PMID38676133
PMCPMC11054247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.