ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Validity Verification of Human Pose-Tracking Algorithms for Gait Analysis Capability.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated gait classification: Comparison of automated algorithms to expert classification.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2026Article
- Validity of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based, Markerless Pose Estimation System Compared to a Marker-Based 3D Motion Analysis System for Gait Assessment-A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reliability and Validity Examination of a New Gait Motion Analysis System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of the Camera Viewing Angle on OpenPose Validity in Motion Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Challenges and Prospects of Sensing Technology for the Promotion of Tele-Physiotherapy: A Narrative Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) clinical gait analysis systems are more affordable and portable than contemporary three-dimensional (3D) clinical models. Using the Vicon 3D motion capture system as the standard, we evaluated the internal statistics of the Imasen and open-source OpenPose gait measurement systems, both designed for 2D input, to validate their output based on the similarity of results and the legitimacy of their inner statistical processes. We measured time factors, distance factors, and joint angles of the hip and knee joints in the sagittal plane while varying speeds and gaits during level walking in three in-person walking experiments under normal, maximum-speed, and tandem scenarios. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the 2D models were greater than 0.769 for all gait parameters compared with those of Vicon, except for some knee joint angles. The relative agreement was excellent for the time-distance gait parameter and moderate-to-excellent for each gait motion contraction range, except for hip joint angles. The time-distance gait parameter was high for Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.899-0.993 but low for 0.298-0.971. Correlation coefficients were greater than 0.571 for time-distance gait parameters but lower for joint angle parameters, particularly hip joint angles. Our study elucidates areas in which to improve 2D models for their widespread clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.