Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38676054›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advancing ADAS Perception: A Sensor-Parameterized Implementation of the GM-PHD Filter.

Christian Bader, Volker Schwieger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian BaderInstitute of Engineering Geodesy, University of Stuttgart, Geschwister-Scholl-Str. 24D, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9064-7133
Volker SchwiegerInstitute of Engineering Geodesy, University of Stuttgart, Geschwister-Scholl-Str. 24D, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9055-9809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern vehicles equipped with Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) rely heavily on sensor fusion to achieve a comprehensive understanding of their surrounding environment. Traditionally, the Kalman Filter (KF) has been a popular choice for this purpose, necessitating complex data association and track management to ensure accurate results. To address errors introduced by these processes, the application of the Gaussian Mixture Probability Hypothesis Density (GM-PHD) filter is a good choice. This alternative filter implicitly handles the association and appearance/disappearance of tracks. The approach presented here allows for the replacement of KF frameworks in many applications while achieving runtimes below 1 ms on the test system. The key innovations lie in the utilization of sensor-based parameter models to implicitly handle varying Fields of View (FoV) and sensing capabilities. These models represent sensor-specific properties such as detection probability and clutter density across the state space. Additionally, we introduce a method for propagating additional track properties such as classification with the GM-PHD filter, further contributing to its versatility and applicability. The proposed GM-PHD filter approach surpasses a KF approach on the KITTI dataset and another custom dataset. The mean OSPA

Indexed as

GM-PHD filtermulti-object trackingsensor fusion

Identifiers

PMID38676054
PMCPMC11054760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.