ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation of Hand Action Classification Performance Using Machine Learning Based on Signals from Two sEMG Electrodes.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How few channels suffice? A hierarchical validation framework for minimal-channel wearable sEMG in upper-limb rehabilitation gesture recognition.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma risk and survival in patients with diabetic cirrhosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification of multiple complications as independent risk factors associated with 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality in hepatitis B-associated cirrhosis patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classification-based myoelectric control has attracted significant interest in recent years, leading to prosthetic hands with advanced functionality, such as multi-grip hands. Thus far, high classification accuracies have been achieved by increasing the number of surface electromyography (sEMG) electrodes or adding other sensing mechanisms. While many prescribed myoelectric hands still adopt two-electrode sEMG systems, detailed studies on signal processing and classification performance are still lacking. In this study, nine able-bodied participants were recruited to perform six typical hand actions, from which sEMG signals from two electrodes were acquired using a Delsys Trigno Research+ acquisition system. Signal processing and machine learning algorithms, specifically, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines (SVM), were used to study classification accuracies. Overall classification accuracy of 93 ± 2%, action-specific accuracy of 97 ± 2%, and F1-score of 87 ± 7% were achieved, which are comparable with those reported from multi-electrode systems. The highest accuracies were achieved using SVM algorithm compared to LDA and KNN algorithms. A logarithmic relationship between classification accuracy and number of features was revealed, which plateaued at five features. These comprehensive findings may potentially contribute to signal processing and machine learning strategies for commonly prescribed myoelectric hand systems with two sEMG electrodes to further improve functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.